| 1 | /* Sort array of link maps according to dependencies. |
| 2 | Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
| 3 | This file is part of the GNU C Library. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or |
| 6 | modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public |
| 7 | License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either |
| 8 | version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
| 11 | but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of |
| 12 | MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU |
| 13 | Lesser General Public License for more details. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public |
| 16 | License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see |
| 17 | <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ |
| 18 | |
| 19 | #include <assert.h> |
| 20 | #include <ldsodefs.h> |
| 21 | #include <elf/dl-tunables.h> |
| 22 | |
| 23 | /* Note: this is the older, "original" sorting algorithm, being used as |
| 24 | default up to 2.35. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Sort array MAPS according to dependencies of the contained objects. |
| 27 | If FOR_FINI is true, this is called for finishing an object. */ |
| 28 | static void |
| 29 | _dl_sort_maps_original (struct link_map **maps, unsigned int nmaps, |
| 30 | unsigned int skip, bool for_fini) |
| 31 | { |
| 32 | /* Allows caller to do the common optimization of skipping the first map, |
| 33 | usually the main binary. */ |
| 34 | maps += skip; |
| 35 | nmaps -= skip; |
| 36 | |
| 37 | /* A list of one element need not be sorted. */ |
| 38 | if (nmaps <= 1) |
| 39 | return; |
| 40 | |
| 41 | unsigned int i = 0; |
| 42 | uint16_t seen[nmaps]; |
| 43 | memset (seen, 0, nmaps * sizeof (seen[0])); |
| 44 | while (1) |
| 45 | { |
| 46 | /* Keep track of which object we looked at this round. */ |
| 47 | ++seen[i]; |
| 48 | struct link_map *thisp = maps[i]; |
| 49 | |
| 50 | if (__glibc_unlikely (for_fini)) |
| 51 | { |
| 52 | /* Do not handle ld.so in secondary namespaces and objects which |
| 53 | are not removed. */ |
| 54 | if (thisp != thisp->l_real || thisp->l_idx == -1) |
| 55 | goto skip; |
| 56 | } |
| 57 | |
| 58 | /* Find the last object in the list for which the current one is |
| 59 | a dependency and move the current object behind the object |
| 60 | with the dependency. */ |
| 61 | unsigned int k = nmaps - 1; |
| 62 | while (k > i) |
| 63 | { |
| 64 | struct link_map **runp = maps[k]->l_initfini; |
| 65 | if (runp != NULL) |
| 66 | /* Look through the dependencies of the object. */ |
| 67 | while (*runp != NULL) |
| 68 | if (__glibc_unlikely (*runp++ == thisp)) |
| 69 | { |
| 70 | move: |
| 71 | /* Move the current object to the back past the last |
| 72 | object with it as the dependency. */ |
| 73 | memmove (&maps[i], &maps[i + 1], |
| 74 | (k - i) * sizeof (maps[0])); |
| 75 | maps[k] = thisp; |
| 76 | |
| 77 | if (seen[i + 1] > nmaps - i) |
| 78 | { |
| 79 | ++i; |
| 80 | goto next_clear; |
| 81 | } |
| 82 | |
| 83 | uint16_t this_seen = seen[i]; |
| 84 | memmove (&seen[i], &seen[i + 1], (k - i) * sizeof (seen[0])); |
| 85 | seen[k] = this_seen; |
| 86 | |
| 87 | goto next; |
| 88 | } |
| 89 | |
| 90 | if (__glibc_unlikely (for_fini && maps[k]->l_reldeps != NULL)) |
| 91 | { |
| 92 | unsigned int m = maps[k]->l_reldeps->act; |
| 93 | struct link_map **relmaps = &maps[k]->l_reldeps->list[0]; |
| 94 | |
| 95 | /* Look through the relocation dependencies of the object. */ |
| 96 | while (m-- > 0) |
| 97 | if (__glibc_unlikely (relmaps[m] == thisp)) |
| 98 | { |
| 99 | /* If a cycle exists with a link time dependency, |
| 100 | preserve the latter. */ |
| 101 | struct link_map **runp = thisp->l_initfini; |
| 102 | if (runp != NULL) |
| 103 | while (*runp != NULL) |
| 104 | if (__glibc_unlikely (*runp++ == maps[k])) |
| 105 | goto ignore; |
| 106 | goto move; |
| 107 | } |
| 108 | ignore:; |
| 109 | } |
| 110 | |
| 111 | --k; |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | |
| 114 | skip: |
| 115 | if (++i == nmaps) |
| 116 | break; |
| 117 | next_clear: |
| 118 | memset (&seen[i], 0, (nmaps - i) * sizeof (seen[0])); |
| 119 | |
| 120 | next:; |
| 121 | } |
| 122 | } |
| 123 | |
| 124 | #if !HAVE_TUNABLES |
| 125 | /* In this case, just default to the original algorithm. */ |
| 126 | strong_alias (_dl_sort_maps_original, _dl_sort_maps); |
| 127 | #else |
| 128 | |
| 129 | /* We use a recursive function due to its better clarity and ease of |
| 130 | implementation, as well as faster execution speed. We already use |
| 131 | alloca() for list allocation during the breadth-first search of |
| 132 | dependencies in _dl_map_object_deps(), and this should be on the |
| 133 | same order of worst-case stack usage. |
| 134 | |
| 135 | Note: the '*rpo' parameter is supposed to point to one past the |
| 136 | last element of the array where we save the sort results, and is |
| 137 | decremented before storing the current map at each level. */ |
| 138 | |
| 139 | static void |
| 140 | dfs_traversal (struct link_map ***rpo, struct link_map *map, |
| 141 | bool *do_reldeps) |
| 142 | { |
| 143 | if (map->l_visited) |
| 144 | return; |
| 145 | |
| 146 | map->l_visited = 1; |
| 147 | |
| 148 | if (map->l_initfini) |
| 149 | { |
| 150 | for (int i = 0; map->l_initfini[i] != NULL; i++) |
| 151 | { |
| 152 | struct link_map *dep = map->l_initfini[i]; |
| 153 | if (dep->l_visited == 0 |
| 154 | && dep->l_main_map == 0) |
| 155 | dfs_traversal (rpo, dep, do_reldeps); |
| 156 | } |
| 157 | } |
| 158 | |
| 159 | if (__glibc_unlikely (do_reldeps != NULL && map->l_reldeps != NULL)) |
| 160 | { |
| 161 | /* Indicate that we encountered relocation dependencies during |
| 162 | traversal. */ |
| 163 | *do_reldeps = true; |
| 164 | |
| 165 | for (int m = map->l_reldeps->act - 1; m >= 0; m--) |
| 166 | { |
| 167 | struct link_map *dep = map->l_reldeps->list[m]; |
| 168 | if (dep->l_visited == 0 |
| 169 | && dep->l_main_map == 0) |
| 170 | dfs_traversal (rpo, dep, do_reldeps); |
| 171 | } |
| 172 | } |
| 173 | |
| 174 | *rpo -= 1; |
| 175 | **rpo = map; |
| 176 | } |
| 177 | |
| 178 | /* Topologically sort array MAPS according to dependencies of the contained |
| 179 | objects. */ |
| 180 | |
| 181 | static void |
| 182 | _dl_sort_maps_dfs (struct link_map **maps, unsigned int nmaps, |
| 183 | unsigned int skip __attribute__ ((unused)), bool for_fini) |
| 184 | { |
| 185 | for (int i = nmaps - 1; i >= 0; i--) |
| 186 | maps[i]->l_visited = 0; |
| 187 | |
| 188 | /* We apply DFS traversal for each of maps[i] until the whole total order |
| 189 | is found and we're at the start of the Reverse-Postorder (RPO) sequence, |
| 190 | which is a topological sort. |
| 191 | |
| 192 | We go from maps[nmaps - 1] backwards towards maps[0] at this level. |
| 193 | Due to the breadth-first search (BFS) ordering we receive, going |
| 194 | backwards usually gives a more shallow depth-first recursion depth, |
| 195 | adding more stack usage safety. Also, combined with the natural |
| 196 | processing order of l_initfini[] at each node during DFS, this maintains |
| 197 | an ordering closer to the original link ordering in the sorting results |
| 198 | under most simpler cases. |
| 199 | |
| 200 | Another reason we order the top level backwards, it that maps[0] is |
| 201 | usually exactly the main object of which we're in the midst of |
| 202 | _dl_map_object_deps() processing, and maps[0]->l_initfini[] is still |
| 203 | blank. If we start the traversal from maps[0], since having no |
| 204 | dependencies yet filled in, maps[0] will always be immediately |
| 205 | incorrectly placed at the last place in the order (first in reverse). |
| 206 | Adjusting the order so that maps[0] is last traversed naturally avoids |
| 207 | this problem. |
| 208 | |
| 209 | Further, the old "optimization" of skipping the main object at maps[0] |
| 210 | from the call-site (i.e. _dl_sort_maps(maps+1,nmaps-1)) is in general |
| 211 | no longer valid, since traversing along object dependency-links |
| 212 | may "find" the main object even when it is not included in the initial |
| 213 | order (e.g. a dlopen()'ed shared object can have circular dependencies |
| 214 | linked back to itself). In such a case, traversing N-1 objects will |
| 215 | create a N-object result, and raise problems. |
| 216 | |
| 217 | To summarize, just passing in the full list, and iterating from back |
| 218 | to front makes things much more straightforward. */ |
| 219 | |
| 220 | /* Array to hold RPO sorting results, before we copy back to maps[]. */ |
| 221 | struct link_map *rpo[nmaps]; |
| 222 | |
| 223 | /* The 'head' position during each DFS iteration. Note that we start at |
| 224 | one past the last element due to first-decrement-then-store (see the |
| 225 | bottom of above dfs_traversal() routine). */ |
| 226 | struct link_map **rpo_head = &rpo[nmaps]; |
| 227 | |
| 228 | bool do_reldeps = false; |
| 229 | bool *do_reldeps_ref = (for_fini ? &do_reldeps : NULL); |
| 230 | |
| 231 | for (int i = nmaps - 1; i >= 0; i--) |
| 232 | { |
| 233 | dfs_traversal (&rpo_head, maps[i], do_reldeps_ref); |
| 234 | |
| 235 | /* We can break early if all objects are already placed. */ |
| 236 | if (rpo_head == rpo) |
| 237 | goto end; |
| 238 | } |
| 239 | assert (rpo_head == rpo); |
| 240 | |
| 241 | end: |
| 242 | /* Here we may do a second pass of sorting, using only l_initfini[] |
| 243 | static dependency links. This is avoided if !FOR_FINI or if we didn't |
| 244 | find any reldeps in the first DFS traversal. |
| 245 | |
| 246 | The reason we do this is: while it is unspecified how circular |
| 247 | dependencies should be handled, the presumed reasonable behavior is to |
| 248 | have destructors to respect static dependency links as much as possible, |
| 249 | overriding reldeps if needed. And the first sorting pass, which takes |
| 250 | l_initfini/l_reldeps links equally, may not preserve this priority. |
| 251 | |
| 252 | Hence we do a 2nd sorting pass, taking only DT_NEEDED links into account |
| 253 | (see how the do_reldeps argument to dfs_traversal() is NULL below). */ |
| 254 | if (do_reldeps) |
| 255 | { |
| 256 | for (int i = nmaps - 1; i >= 0; i--) |
| 257 | rpo[i]->l_visited = 0; |
| 258 | |
| 259 | struct link_map **maps_head = &maps[nmaps]; |
| 260 | for (int i = nmaps - 1; i >= 0; i--) |
| 261 | { |
| 262 | dfs_traversal (&maps_head, rpo[i], NULL); |
| 263 | |
| 264 | /* We can break early if all objects are already placed. |
| 265 | The below memcpy is not needed in the do_reldeps case here, |
| 266 | since we wrote back to maps[] during DFS traversal. */ |
| 267 | if (maps_head == maps) |
| 268 | return; |
| 269 | } |
| 270 | assert (maps_head == maps); |
| 271 | return; |
| 272 | } |
| 273 | |
| 274 | memcpy (maps, rpo, sizeof (struct link_map *) * nmaps); |
| 275 | } |
| 276 | |
| 277 | void |
| 278 | _dl_sort_maps_init (void) |
| 279 | { |
| 280 | int32_t algorithm = TUNABLE_GET (glibc, rtld, dynamic_sort, int32_t, NULL); |
| 281 | GLRO(dl_dso_sort_algo) = algorithm == 1 ? dso_sort_algorithm_original |
| 282 | : dso_sort_algorithm_dfs; |
| 283 | } |
| 284 | |
| 285 | void |
| 286 | _dl_sort_maps (struct link_map **maps, unsigned int nmaps, |
| 287 | unsigned int skip, bool for_fini) |
| 288 | { |
| 289 | /* It can be tempting to use a static function pointer to store and call |
| 290 | the current selected sorting algorithm routine, but experimentation |
| 291 | shows that current processors still do not handle indirect branches |
| 292 | that efficiently, plus a static function pointer will involve |
| 293 | PTR_MANGLE/DEMANGLE, further impairing performance of small, common |
| 294 | input cases. A simple if-case with direct function calls appears to |
| 295 | be the fastest. */ |
| 296 | if (__glibc_likely (GLRO(dl_dso_sort_algo) == dso_sort_algorithm_original)) |
| 297 | _dl_sort_maps_original (maps, nmaps, skip, for_fini); |
| 298 | else |
| 299 | _dl_sort_maps_dfs (maps, nmaps, skip, for_fini); |
| 300 | } |
| 301 | |
| 302 | #endif /* HAVE_TUNABLES. */ |
| 303 | |